The SPO Method; Reply to Dr. J. S. Griffith

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Reply to Dr. Selinger et al.'s letter.

We appreciate the input from Selinger et al. They questioned the utility of surveillance for patients with colonic Crohn's disease (CD), finding a cumulative incidence of only 2% of colorectal cancer (CRC) at 30 years. In Australia they found 5 cases of CRC among 327 patients, and we in Finland 4 among 208 patients with colonic CD. The follow up periods were 1977–1992 and 1986–2007, respectivel...

متن کامل

Reply to Dr. Papamichael et al.'s letter.

We thank Dr. Papamichael and colleagues for taking an interest in our work. We agree that fecal calprotectin (FC) is an accurate surrogate marker of endoscopic activity both in Crohn's disease (CD)1,2 and ulcerative colitis (UC).3,2 However, data on its usefulness to predict postoperative endoscopic recurrence (PER) in CD patients are more scarce.1,4 Since PER is one of the main indications for...

متن کامل

Reply to Dr. Caprilli et al.'s letter.

First of all we would like to thank Professor Caprilli for his interest in our work. We totally agree with his statement that surgery continues to have an important place in the management of severe ulcerative colitis, even in the era of biological therapies. However, the results of our study1 and the study from Rome2 cannot be compared as they consisted of two totally different populations. In...

متن کامل

Reply to Dr. Joob et al.'s letter.

We appreciate the opportunity to respond to Dr. Joob's letter with respect to our case report published in JCC.1 While writing the case report our intention was not to mention the side effects of treatment with anti-TNF alpha therapy. We apologize for not having reported in the text all pre-screening examinations for the biological therapy to which the patient was subjected. It is important to ...

متن کامل

Reply to Dr. Weiskirchen.

TO THE EDITOR: We would like to thank Dr. Weiskirchen (5) for his interest in our recent publication (3). As we mentioned in the DISCUSSION and as pointed out by Dr. Weiskirchen, the absence of protein data in our adenovirus model represents a limitation of our study. Regarding the RNA expression, we also expected to find a greater difference in ccn1/cyr61 gene expression in the mice instilled ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of Chemical Physics

سال: 1962

ISSN: 0021-9606,1089-7690

DOI: 10.1063/1.1732802